Onary function tests FEV1, predicted FEV1, L FVC, predicted FVC, L

September 21, 2017

Onary function tests FEV1, predicted FEV1, L FVC, predicted FVC, L FEV1/FVC ratio RV, predicted TLC, predicted TGV, predicted Raw, predicted Sgaw, predicted DLCO, predicted Kco, predicted Symptoms Dyspnoea, mMRC scale Clinical COPD Questionnaire, Total score Comorbidities Ischemic heart disease, Stroke, Peripheral artery disease, * Diabetes, Muscle weakness, * Osteoporosis, Anaemia, CT scan Fruquintinib chemical information emphysema present, Alveolar destruction Absent, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Bronchial thickening Mild, Moderate, Severe, Bronchiectasis, Mortality Deaths, n ( ) 1 (0.8) 64 30 6 12 61 31 7 1 39 14 2.5 14* 8 5* 5 6 0 [0?] 1.8 [0.8?.5] 93 [87?03] 2.9 [2.5?.2] 115 [106?26] 4.5 [3.8?.0] 0.66 [0.63?.68] 115 [101?33] 109 [102?17] 117 [107?33] 152 [126?87] 82 [67?9] 80 [66?1] 86 [73?8] 83 (65) 17 (5) 62 [58?7] 80 25 [24?8] 43 [32?5]GOLD II n =GOLD III n =GOLD IV n =68 [61?4] 79 26 [23?8] 47 [34?1]68 [62?5] 78 24 [20?7] 50 [32?4]61 [58?5] 72 22 [19?5] 46 [33?0]28 (31) 72 (33)5 (4) 95 (38)0 (0) 100 (24)64 [57?1] 1.8 [1.5?.1] 94 [85?05] 3.3 [2.8?.1] 0.55 [0.48?.60] 132 [109?55] 104 [93?14] 130 [110?51] 189 [164?40] 61 [48?5] 58 [49?4] 79 [63?2]40 [36?4] 1.1 [0.9?.3] 79 [70?9] 2.8 [2.4?.3] 0.39 [0.35?.44] 171.0 [143?99] 112 [101?21] 161 [137?77] 257 [224?18] 36 [31?6] 45 [34?7] 64 [52?7]24 [20?8] 0.7 [0.6?.8] 64 [54?4] 2.2 [1.7?.9] 0.31 [0.25?.35] 227 [181?71] 124 [110?36] 193 [169?17] 355 [274?27] 25 [21?1] 33 [27?8] 56 [45?3]1 [0?] 3.5 [1.8?.3]2 [1?] 5.5 [3.5?.8]3 [1?] 6.8 [5.3?.0]27 3 21* 17 29* 1523 4 12 14 40 1726 6 11 13 58 3931 38 2218 26 298 13 3037 45 1824 49 2732 48 205 (3.0)21 (14.1)23 (25.8)BMI : body mass index; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, FVC: forced vital capacity, RV: residual volume, TLC: total lung capacity, TGV: thoracic gas volume, Raw: airway resistance, Sgaw: specific airway conductance, DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, KCO: ratio of DLCO to alveolar volume, mMRC: modified Medical Research Council Scale. *, missing data: GOLD I 83 , GOLD II 28 . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051048.tCOPD Phenotypes at High Risk of MortalityFigure 2. Dendrogram illustrating the results of the cluster analysis in 527 COPD subjects. Subjects were classified using agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis based on 1317923 the main axes identified by principal component analysis (PCA) and multiple correspondence analyses (MCA, see Methods section). Each vertical line represents an individual subject and the length of vertical lines represents the degree of similarity between subjects. The horizontal lines identify possible cut-off for choosing the optimal number of clusters in the data. When choosing 3 clusters (upper line) the 3 groups (labelled 1 to 3) have differential mortality rates (0.5 , 20.6 and 14.3 for Phenotype 1, 2, and 3, respectively). When choosing 5 clusters (lower line, labelled 19 to 59), subjects in clusters 19 and 29 had comparable mortality rates (0.7 and 0 , respectively) and subjects 1379592 in clusters 49 and 59 had similar mortality rates (14.3 in each group), suggesting that grouping in 5 phenotypes would not improve patient classification. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051048.gmarked emphysema and hyperinflation, low BMI, severe dyspnoea, and impaired HRQoL. One third of these subjects were women, and osteoporosis and muscle 374913-63-0 chemical information weakness were highly prevalent, whereas diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities were less prevalent. Two subjects were lost to follow-up and morta.Onary function tests FEV1, predicted FEV1, L FVC, predicted FVC, L FEV1/FVC ratio RV, predicted TLC, predicted TGV, predicted Raw, predicted Sgaw, predicted DLCO, predicted Kco, predicted Symptoms Dyspnoea, mMRC scale Clinical COPD Questionnaire, Total score Comorbidities Ischemic heart disease, Stroke, Peripheral artery disease, * Diabetes, Muscle weakness, * Osteoporosis, Anaemia, CT scan Emphysema present, Alveolar destruction Absent, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Bronchial thickening Mild, Moderate, Severe, Bronchiectasis, Mortality Deaths, n ( ) 1 (0.8) 64 30 6 12 61 31 7 1 39 14 2.5 14* 8 5* 5 6 0 [0?] 1.8 [0.8?.5] 93 [87?03] 2.9 [2.5?.2] 115 [106?26] 4.5 [3.8?.0] 0.66 [0.63?.68] 115 [101?33] 109 [102?17] 117 [107?33] 152 [126?87] 82 [67?9] 80 [66?1] 86 [73?8] 83 (65) 17 (5) 62 [58?7] 80 25 [24?8] 43 [32?5]GOLD II n =GOLD III n =GOLD IV n =68 [61?4] 79 26 [23?8] 47 [34?1]68 [62?5] 78 24 [20?7] 50 [32?4]61 [58?5] 72 22 [19?5] 46 [33?0]28 (31) 72 (33)5 (4) 95 (38)0 (0) 100 (24)64 [57?1] 1.8 [1.5?.1] 94 [85?05] 3.3 [2.8?.1] 0.55 [0.48?.60] 132 [109?55] 104 [93?14] 130 [110?51] 189 [164?40] 61 [48?5] 58 [49?4] 79 [63?2]40 [36?4] 1.1 [0.9?.3] 79 [70?9] 2.8 [2.4?.3] 0.39 [0.35?.44] 171.0 [143?99] 112 [101?21] 161 [137?77] 257 [224?18] 36 [31?6] 45 [34?7] 64 [52?7]24 [20?8] 0.7 [0.6?.8] 64 [54?4] 2.2 [1.7?.9] 0.31 [0.25?.35] 227 [181?71] 124 [110?36] 193 [169?17] 355 [274?27] 25 [21?1] 33 [27?8] 56 [45?3]1 [0?] 3.5 [1.8?.3]2 [1?] 5.5 [3.5?.8]3 [1?] 6.8 [5.3?.0]27 3 21* 17 29* 1523 4 12 14 40 1726 6 11 13 58 3931 38 2218 26 298 13 3037 45 1824 49 2732 48 205 (3.0)21 (14.1)23 (25.8)BMI : body mass index; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, FVC: forced vital capacity, RV: residual volume, TLC: total lung capacity, TGV: thoracic gas volume, Raw: airway resistance, Sgaw: specific airway conductance, DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, KCO: ratio of DLCO to alveolar volume, mMRC: modified Medical Research Council Scale. *, missing data: GOLD I 83 , GOLD II 28 . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051048.tCOPD Phenotypes at High Risk of MortalityFigure 2. Dendrogram illustrating the results of the cluster analysis in 527 COPD subjects. Subjects were classified using agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis based on 1317923 the main axes identified by principal component analysis (PCA) and multiple correspondence analyses (MCA, see Methods section). Each vertical line represents an individual subject and the length of vertical lines represents the degree of similarity between subjects. The horizontal lines identify possible cut-off for choosing the optimal number of clusters in the data. When choosing 3 clusters (upper line) the 3 groups (labelled 1 to 3) have differential mortality rates (0.5 , 20.6 and 14.3 for Phenotype 1, 2, and 3, respectively). When choosing 5 clusters (lower line, labelled 19 to 59), subjects in clusters 19 and 29 had comparable mortality rates (0.7 and 0 , respectively) and subjects 1379592 in clusters 49 and 59 had similar mortality rates (14.3 in each group), suggesting that grouping in 5 phenotypes would not improve patient classification. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051048.gmarked emphysema and hyperinflation, low BMI, severe dyspnoea, and impaired HRQoL. One third of these subjects were women, and osteoporosis and muscle weakness were highly prevalent, whereas diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities were less prevalent. Two subjects were lost to follow-up and morta.