The preliminary morphological identification of each nematode was confirmed by comparison of the sequence obtained from its PCR product with database entries

July 3, 2017

on assays in ONTCs where rostral forebrain and hindbrain were ablated. Under these conditions and following the BAF incubation protocol, the tissue left did not express any FGF8 downstream genes and the ectopic induction of ERK1/2 activity was found symmetrically distributed around the bead on FgfR1 positive domain. In fact the lack of FgfR1 in the midbrain and hindbrain region, does not disturb ERK1/2 polarizing effects on both brain regions. Scale bars are 0,5 mm except for C’, E’ that are 100 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039977.g005 and pial sides of this pseudostratified neuroepithelium suggesting diffusion facilitation through basal lamina and ). Similar patterns of Fgf8 gene expression and FGF8 protein distribution were also observed in cryostat sections of wild-type ONTCs. We then treated the ONTCs with BFA at 25 mg/ml for a period of 4 hours of incubation. Under BFA treatment, a positive anti-FGF8b immunolabeling was detected exclusively in the territory of the IsO and now restricted to the Fgf8 gene expression domain. Interestingly, BFA treatment revealed a more intense immunopositive reaction for FGF8 only at the ventricular surface of the pseudostratified isthmic neuroepithelium. Also, the FGF8 immunostaining was detected as bead-like structures, MedChemExpress 5(6)-Carboxy-X-rhodamine resembling PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22205030 exocytic vesicles and interestingly only concentrated close to the ventricular surface. These data strongly suggest that FGF8-producing cells in the mouse IsO, secrete the morphogen near the lumen of the neural tube but the gradient of secreted Fgf8 protein forms a gradient along the basement membrane. More importantly, blockade of exocytosis caused a fast downregulation of ERK1/2 activity in the IsO domain, while in territories further away, cells still remained dpERK positive. Thus, the sudden blockade of exocytosis of FGF8 protein secretion affected first the FGF8b producing cells and gradually the neighboring territories away from them. These results provide new cellular mechanistic information about the induction characteristics of the isthmic FGF8-expressing cells. Therefore, these neuroepithelial cells required secretion of FGF8 to exert proper activation of FGF8 intracellular pathways. Interestingly, implantation of an ectopic FGF8b bead inside this negative phosphorylated ERK1/2 domain for still exerted an asymmetric distribution of dpERK labeling after 2 hours of incubation. During this process of depriving the neural tube from extracellular FGF8 protein, Mkp3 was not detected inside the negative phosphorylated ERK1/2 domain. Of the other known FGF8 modulators we found that Sef expression was completely downregulated in the mesencephalon but not in the r1. Moreover, the Sprouty1 gene showed a similar pattern as Sef but with a less severe phenotype in the mesencephalon. Finally, expression pattern of Sprouty2 was maintained both in mesencephalic and rhombencephalic territories as in control ONTCs. In conclusion, the specification of early FGF8related positional information signaling that will induce later differentially biological responses at different distances from the IsO seems to be controlled by graded expression of the FGF8 negative modulators. Our results strongly suggest requirement for mainly Sprouty1/2, but not of Mkp3 and most probably not of Sef, for the initial polarized response to FGF8 in the mouse midbrain. Discussion The reliable mapping of active ERK signaling domains in Drosophila and diverse vertebrates such as xenopus, zebrafish, mouse and c