Pation, age, and qualifying condition. 2.2. Measures 2.2.1 Measures–Variables measured included the UTAUT

April 16, 2018

Pation, age, and qualifying condition. 2.2. Measures 2.2.1 Measures–Variables Valsartan/sacubitril web measured included the UTAUT variables: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions in presence of the moderating factor, and year born (used to create generational groups) predicting the behavioral Avermectin B1a web intention for use of tablet. The results of the study are presented in the next section see Table 1 for the correlation matrix. 2.2.2 UTAUT–We measured participants’ determinants of tablet use and adoption with fifteen Likert-type items adopted from Venkatesh et al. (2003) with responses ranging fromComput Human Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 September 01.Magsamen-Conrad et al.Page1(strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree). Factor analysis (varimax) and scree plot indicated four factors consistent with prior research. The first factor was social influence (eigenvalue=11.05, 58 var., all items loading above .71, and not above .33 on other subscales). Six items measured this factor. A sample item includes “People who are important to me think that I should use a tablet.” The items had good reliability (= .91, M=3.33, SD=.88) and were averaged to form a scale with a high score indicating higher social influence. The second factor was performance expectancy (eigenvalue=1.90, 10 var., all items loading above .66, and not above .38 on other subscales). Five items measured this factor. A sample item includes “Using a tablet in my personal life enables me to accomplish tasks more quickly.” The items had good reliability (= .97, M=3.54, SD=1.08) and were averaged to form a scale with a high score indicating higher performance expectancy. The third factor was effort expectancy (eigenvalue=1.49, 8 var., all items loading above . 89, and not above .35 on other subscales). Four items measured this factor. A sample item includes “Learning to operate a tablet is easy for me.” The items had good reliability (= . 96, M=3.74, SD=1.06) and were averaged to form a scale with a high score indicating lower effort expectancy. The fourth factor was behavioral intention (eigenvalue=1.20, 6 var., all items loading above .77, and not above .36 on other subscales) was measured by four items. A sample item includes “I intend to use a tablet in the next 3 months.” The items had good reliability (= .91, M=4.14, SD=.94) and were averaged to form a scale with a higher score indicating more behavioral intention to use tablets. Facilitating conditions have a direct influence on use behavior, beyond behavioral intentions (Venkatesh et al., 2003) and this is why measurement statistics for facilitating conditions were evaluated separately from other determinants in the UTAUT model. Facilitating conditions were also measured by four five-point Likert-type items. A sample item includes “I have the resources necessary to use a tablet.” After one item was removed (“A tablet is not compatible with other ways that I communicate (e.g., face-to face communication)”recoded), factor analysis indicated a single factor solution (eigenvalue=2.08; 69.3 var.). The items had acceptable reliability (=.78, M=3.77, SD=.87) and were averaged to form a scale with a higher score indicating greater perceptions of conditions that facilitate tablet use.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript 3. Results Author Manuscript3.1. Generational Differences in UTAUT Predictors First, we conducted a series of independent samples t-tests to determine the relatio.Pation, age, and qualifying condition. 2.2. Measures 2.2.1 Measures–Variables measured included the UTAUT variables: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions in presence of the moderating factor, and year born (used to create generational groups) predicting the behavioral intention for use of tablet. The results of the study are presented in the next section see Table 1 for the correlation matrix. 2.2.2 UTAUT–We measured participants’ determinants of tablet use and adoption with fifteen Likert-type items adopted from Venkatesh et al. (2003) with responses ranging fromComput Human Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 September 01.Magsamen-Conrad et al.Page1(strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree). Factor analysis (varimax) and scree plot indicated four factors consistent with prior research. The first factor was social influence (eigenvalue=11.05, 58 var., all items loading above .71, and not above .33 on other subscales). Six items measured this factor. A sample item includes “People who are important to me think that I should use a tablet.” The items had good reliability (= .91, M=3.33, SD=.88) and were averaged to form a scale with a high score indicating higher social influence. The second factor was performance expectancy (eigenvalue=1.90, 10 var., all items loading above .66, and not above .38 on other subscales). Five items measured this factor. A sample item includes “Using a tablet in my personal life enables me to accomplish tasks more quickly.” The items had good reliability (= .97, M=3.54, SD=1.08) and were averaged to form a scale with a high score indicating higher performance expectancy. The third factor was effort expectancy (eigenvalue=1.49, 8 var., all items loading above . 89, and not above .35 on other subscales). Four items measured this factor. A sample item includes “Learning to operate a tablet is easy for me.” The items had good reliability (= . 96, M=3.74, SD=1.06) and were averaged to form a scale with a high score indicating lower effort expectancy. The fourth factor was behavioral intention (eigenvalue=1.20, 6 var., all items loading above .77, and not above .36 on other subscales) was measured by four items. A sample item includes “I intend to use a tablet in the next 3 months.” The items had good reliability (= .91, M=4.14, SD=.94) and were averaged to form a scale with a higher score indicating more behavioral intention to use tablets. Facilitating conditions have a direct influence on use behavior, beyond behavioral intentions (Venkatesh et al., 2003) and this is why measurement statistics for facilitating conditions were evaluated separately from other determinants in the UTAUT model. Facilitating conditions were also measured by four five-point Likert-type items. A sample item includes “I have the resources necessary to use a tablet.” After one item was removed (“A tablet is not compatible with other ways that I communicate (e.g., face-to face communication)”recoded), factor analysis indicated a single factor solution (eigenvalue=2.08; 69.3 var.). The items had acceptable reliability (=.78, M=3.77, SD=.87) and were averaged to form a scale with a higher score indicating greater perceptions of conditions that facilitate tablet use.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript 3. Results Author Manuscript3.1. Generational Differences in UTAUT Predictors First, we conducted a series of independent samples t-tests to determine the relatio.