Eview, see [4]). It seems reasonable that due to the intrinsic complexity

April 10, 2018

Eview, see [4]). It seems reasonable that due to the intrinsic complexity of their lipids, cell membranes are arranged in far more intricate structures than simple homogenous fluid bilayers. Membrane heterogeneity is illustrated by unequal lipid distribution among (i) different PMs, (ii) distinct intracellular compartments, (iii) inner vs outer membrane leaflets, and (iv) the same leaflet. Whereas the three first levels of membrane heterogeneity are well accepted by the scientific community, the fourth level is still disputed. Limited availability of fluorescent tools, use of poor lipid fixatives, imaging of membrane artifacts, and description of unclassified membrane domains have intensified the debate in this rapidly growing area of research. In this Section, we will provide a historical AprotininMedChemExpress Aprotinin review of the different types of domains evidenced at the PM of eukaryotes. Current views on structural and dynamical aspects of biological membranes have been strongly influenced by the homogenous fluid mosaic model proposed by Singer and Nicolson in 1972 [5]. In this model, proteins are dispersed and individually embedded in a more or less randomly organized fluid lipid bilayer. In 1987, Simons and Van Meer discovered that glycosphingolipids (GSLs) cluster in the Golgi apparatus before being sorted to the apical surface of polarized epithelial cells [6]. In 1997, Simons and coll. proposed the lipid raft theory [7], where GSLs form detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) enriched in OxaliplatinMedChemExpress Oxaliplatin cholesterol and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)anchored proteins in cold non-ionic detergents such as Triton. Such theory was however questioned for several reasons. Among others, it has been shown that Triton can promote domain formation and may even create domains in a homogenous fluid lipid mixture, arguing against an identification of DRMs with functional rafts [8]. In 2006, lipid rafts were redefined as: “small (20-100nm), heterogeneous, highly dynamic, sterol- and sphingolipid (SL)-enriched domains that compartmentalize cellular processes. Small rafts can sometimes be stabilized to form larger platforms through protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions” [9]. In addition to rafts, other nanoscale domains, i.e. <100nm in diameter (also mis-called microdomains), have been described at the PM of eukaryotes: caveolae [10] and tetraspaninrich domains [11]. Caveolae are defined as 60-80nm invaginations of the PM and are especially abundant in endothelial cells and adipocytes [12]. Tetraspanins are structural proteins bearing four transmembrane domains, which control the formation of membrane tubules. They can oligomerize and recruit various proteins to establish functional domains [13]. There are several reasons to consider lipid rafts, caveolae and tetraspanin-enriched domains as distinct types of domains (reviewed in [11, 14]). However, they share similarities such as small size, instability and governance by the liquid-ordered (Lo)/liquid-disordered (Ld) phase partitioning described in purified lipid systems (Section 2.1). Besides nanometric lipid domains, morphological evidence for stable (min vs sec) submicrometric (i.e. >200nm in diameter vs 20-100nm) lipid domains was reported inProg Lipid Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptCarquin et al.Pageartificial [15-17] and highly specialized biological membranes, such as lung surfactant and skin stratum corneum [16, 18]. Such subm.Eview, see [4]). It seems reasonable that due to the intrinsic complexity of their lipids, cell membranes are arranged in far more intricate structures than simple homogenous fluid bilayers. Membrane heterogeneity is illustrated by unequal lipid distribution among (i) different PMs, (ii) distinct intracellular compartments, (iii) inner vs outer membrane leaflets, and (iv) the same leaflet. Whereas the three first levels of membrane heterogeneity are well accepted by the scientific community, the fourth level is still disputed. Limited availability of fluorescent tools, use of poor lipid fixatives, imaging of membrane artifacts, and description of unclassified membrane domains have intensified the debate in this rapidly growing area of research. In this Section, we will provide a historical review of the different types of domains evidenced at the PM of eukaryotes. Current views on structural and dynamical aspects of biological membranes have been strongly influenced by the homogenous fluid mosaic model proposed by Singer and Nicolson in 1972 [5]. In this model, proteins are dispersed and individually embedded in a more or less randomly organized fluid lipid bilayer. In 1987, Simons and Van Meer discovered that glycosphingolipids (GSLs) cluster in the Golgi apparatus before being sorted to the apical surface of polarized epithelial cells [6]. In 1997, Simons and coll. proposed the lipid raft theory [7], where GSLs form detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) enriched in cholesterol and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)anchored proteins in cold non-ionic detergents such as Triton. Such theory was however questioned for several reasons. Among others, it has been shown that Triton can promote domain formation and may even create domains in a homogenous fluid lipid mixture, arguing against an identification of DRMs with functional rafts [8]. In 2006, lipid rafts were redefined as: “small (20-100nm), heterogeneous, highly dynamic, sterol- and sphingolipid (SL)-enriched domains that compartmentalize cellular processes. Small rafts can sometimes be stabilized to form larger platforms through protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions” [9]. In addition to rafts, other nanoscale domains, i.e. <100nm in diameter (also mis-called microdomains), have been described at the PM of eukaryotes: caveolae [10] and tetraspaninrich domains [11]. Caveolae are defined as 60-80nm invaginations of the PM and are especially abundant in endothelial cells and adipocytes [12]. Tetraspanins are structural proteins bearing four transmembrane domains, which control the formation of membrane tubules. They can oligomerize and recruit various proteins to establish functional domains [13]. There are several reasons to consider lipid rafts, caveolae and tetraspanin-enriched domains as distinct types of domains (reviewed in [11, 14]). However, they share similarities such as small size, instability and governance by the liquid-ordered (Lo)/liquid-disordered (Ld) phase partitioning described in purified lipid systems (Section 2.1). Besides nanometric lipid domains, morphological evidence for stable (min vs sec) submicrometric (i.e. >200nm in diameter vs 20-100nm) lipid domains was reported inProg Lipid Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptCarquin et al.Pageartificial [15-17] and highly specialized biological membranes, such as lung surfactant and skin stratum corneum [16, 18]. Such subm.