It is known that effective protection against enteropathogenic bacteria such as Citrobacter rodentium requires intact CD4+ T and B lymphocyte compartments

July 5, 2017

rized by several rupture events which corresponded to peaks in the time series of the tensile force. Secondary structure elements of the protein unfolded sequentially starting from the C-terminus leading to exposure of the proteolytic site. The first major force peak coincided with undocking of the second N-terminal turn of the C-terminal helix a6. This was followed by undocking of strand b6, unfolding of helix a5, undocking of strand b5 and finally pulling of strand b4 where the cleavage site is located. This event caused full solvent exposure of the backbone of residues Tyr1605 and Met1606 which is known to be cleaved by ADAMTS13. The simulation was stopped after this point, because unfolding of the rest of the protein is probably not necessary for the proteolytic NP-031112 process. Until rupture of b4, the N-terminal part of Structural Basis of Type 2A VWD the protein remained in the same conformation as in the native state whereas the C-terminal part was unfolded. The unfolding pathway presented here is qualitatively consistent with a previous MD study performed with a model structure of the PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22212322 A2 domain before the crystallographic structure was known. 4 Structural Basis of Type 2A VWD Interestingly, the part of the protein comprising residues 1645 to 1668 became solvent exposed while helix a6 undocked from the rest of the protein and unfolded. This region was identified in a previous experimental study to be the minimum docking unit of ADAMTS13, and a subset of it was shown to be the recognition site for the spacer domain of ADAMTS13. Thus it can be speculated that unfolding of this region might facilitate docking of the proteolytic enzyme. Effect of type 2A mutations on a6 undocking. Two of the type 2A mutations investigated here, I1628T and L1657I contact residues in the C-terminal helix a6. Thus, in order to understand their effect onto the unfolding pathways, it was 5 Structural Basis of Type 2A VWD necessary to investigate whether they alter the force resistance of a6 undocking, which is the very first event observed in all unfolding simulations with the wild-type and mutants. Simulations performed with the mutant E1638K were also included in this analysis. Although the mutation site E1638K is located distally on a5, it is not excluded that destabilization of helix a5 could propagate through the adjacent strand b6 to the Cterminal helix. Visual inspection of the trajectories with the wild-type revealed that the force peak observed during a6 undocking coincides with separation of the side chain of Ala1661 from the rest of the protein. To better quantify this separation and how the mutations might affect it, residues were identified which formed native side chain contacts with Ala1661, i.e., Phe1520, Ile1628, Ile1651, Leu1657 and Pro1662. These amino acids together with Ala1661 form a hydrophobic core which in the native state is buried by the C-terminal helix and is thus referred to as the ��C-terminal hydrophobic core��for the purposes of this manuscript. In the case of the wild-type, solvent exposure of the C-terminal hydrophobic core always coincided with a sharp drop of the tensile force, indicating a major rupture event, i.e., separation of a6 from the rest of the protein. Strikingly, the force peak at which the C-terminal hydrophobic core became exposed was smaller in the case of the three mutants compared to the wild-type. The smaller force peak is marginally statistically significant for E1638K and L1657I and statistically significant